AI document review

Specs, PRDs and proposals, reviewed by a panel.

Paste or attach any document and models from different labs review it together. Their findings merge into one ranked list, you talk through the ones that matter, and the panel writes one document saying what to change.

The Apex Directive discussion screen: a queue of issues ranked by severity, reviewers from different labs discussing the top one, and the merged recommendation.
Seat any mix of
  • Claude
  • GPT
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Grok
  • Qwen
  • Kimi
Watch

See a document review in 22 seconds.

How it works

From a draft to a list of changes in four steps.

1

Attach the document

Specs, PRDs, memos, proposals, policies or plans. Choose the document review type, or write your own.

2

Discover

Every seat reads it in parallel and lists what it would change. Duplicates are merged and the rest ranked.

3

Discuss

Open any finding and every seat weighs in on that one thing, including the models that never flagged it. Dismiss what does not apply.

4

Finalize

What survives becomes one markdown document: one recommendation per issue, ranked, with action items.

Why a panel

Several readers catch what one reader misses.

Models from different labs notice different gaps and question different assumptions. You see each finding once, with who raised it and where they disagree.

Review almost anything

Anything you can attach or paste: specs, PRDs, memos, proposals, RFCs and plans.

Findings, not essays

No comparing a wall of text from every model. One list, ranked by severity.

Different labs, different lenses

Where the models agree, you can trust it. Where they disagree, you'll see it, and that is usually where the real question is.

Talk it through

Open any finding and the whole panel weighs in on it. Dismiss the ones that do not apply, and they stay out of the final document.

Your table, your call

Seat two to five models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, DeepSeek, Meta, Alibaba, xAI and Moonshot, in any mix, and swap them per review.

Your work stays yours

We never store the files you submit and nothing is used for training. We keep what a review found, so History has it. Read how.

What you get

One document that says what to change.

  • One voice. A single recommendation per issue, with the discussion's conclusions folded in.
  • Ranked and actionable. Critical first, each with concrete steps you can act on.
  • Ready to paste. Download it as markdown for a doc, a ticket or a PR.
  • Saved to History. Come back to the findings later, from any device.

Bring your next review to the table.

Seven days on our keys with 250,000 credits. No card, so there is nothing to cancel.